Begich Angered by Exxon Valdez Ruling

Today the Supreme Court slashed the punitive damage award for Alaskans hurt by the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill, the worst oil spill in U.S. history. The court reduced the $2.5 billion award to just over $507 million. Mark just responded to the decision:

“The thousands of Alaskans whose lives were devastated by this disaster are hurt, once again, by this ruling," Begich said. "What we’re seeing today is another example of how Washington is out of touch with real people. The justices have sided with corporate America rather than with Alaska families who have suffered for nearly 20 years.”

Begich added that while the livelihoods of thousands of Alaska fishermen and others were destroyed by the spill, Sen. Ted Stevens has continued to work to serve the interests of big business, rather than put pressure on Exxon to settle the lawsuit or drop its appeals.

“Sen. Stevens continues to show he works hard for special interests, but where has he been when it comes to doing what’s right for Alaskans?” Begich said.

In 1989, the Exxon Valdez spilled more than 11 million gallons of crude oil in Alaska’s Prince William Sound decimating fish and wildlife populations. In 1994, a federal jury in Anchorage awarded more than 32,000 plaintiffs harmed by the spill $5 billion in punitive damages. Exxon appealed and the award was reduced by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to $2.5 billion. Exxon appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court which ruled today.

With Exxon’s net income last year of over $40 billion, Begich called on the oil company to pay up within 30 days.

“No more delays. Exxon needs to write those checks today,” Begich said.

Comments

Your addiction vs. litigation

If we have a major disaster like an earthquake, who will we take to court then?  Somewhere along the line we've become dependent on litigation to hold us together and what I ask happened to the "Alaskan" spirit in us?

I also feel this equates to filing a lawsuit against big tobacco for your smoking habit and the cancer you got from smoking.

The more oil exploration, the more exporting of these resources, the higher the risk for something to go wrong. We're addicted, and the more we suck off the pipe the higher the risk.

Don't like the way things went and want to send a message to big oil? Stop Buying Oil! But wait you can't because your addiction needs to be satisfied. "Hey MARK, check out this SUV, if they spill more oil I might be able to fuel this baby!"

Oil and Tobacco aren't quite the same here...

I see your point, Michael - if you get lung cancer from smoking, it's a result of your own decision to smoke.  However, if your fishing livelihood is ruined by an oil spill... well, it doesn't matter if you never even owned a car, it wouldn't have changed that.   I'm all for personal responsibility, and I hate our litigious society - but if a corporation makes a big mistake that harms others, it needs to do its best to make amends.   If you accidentally hit a pedestrian with your car, you'd probably pay for their medical expenses, right?